|
|
|
Martin Thomas.
Britain, France and Appeasement: Anglo-French
Relations in the Popular Front Era.
Oxford: Berg, 1996. x + 268
pp. Notes, bibliography, and index. $17.50 US (pb). ISBN
1-85973-192-9.
Review by William D. Irvine, York University, for H-France,
September 1997.
When Hitler remilitarized the Rhineland in March 1936, Anglo-French
relations were at a post-war low. To the problems of the 1920s--
reparations, war debts, the middle-east--were added the tensions
over re-armament, France's eastern alliances, the Franco-Italian
rapprochement, the Anglo-German naval agreement, and mutual
recriminations over the Ethiopian crisis. In essence, the French
found the British to be insensitive to its security needs; the
British found the French obsession with security to be inimical to
an understanding with Germany. Paradoxically, on Martin Thomas'
account, the election of the Popular Front government, so different
ideologically from that of Great Britain, marked the beginnings of
a warmer relationship. It was under the Popular Front that the
French began to lay the groundwork for an effective peace-time
alliance. The "bedrock of Popular Front diplomacy would be the
continued effort to draw Britain further into continental affairs,
not by challenging British appeasement policy but by appropriating
it" (p. 55). By this, the author means that the French remained
sceptical of the possibility of taming German territorial ambitions
by appeasing them, but wanted to demonstrate to the British that
if, as they were certain would be the case, her appeasement efforts
failed, the failure could not be blamed on French truculence.
The book is based on an very thorough knowledge of
the relevant French and British archives. It is classic diplomatic
history, but pays due obeisance to the importance of financial
matters and, at least with respect to France, demonstrates some
sensitivity to domestic politics. Nonetheless, there remains a
great deal of what Monsieur X said to Lord Y in this account. No
crime that, but at times it is uncommonly hard to dig a clear
thesis out of this dense text. What, for example, are we to make
of the Anglo-French-Belgium staff talks in the spring of 1936?
Either they had "a lasting symbolic importance" (p. 41), or "they
did not add up to much" (p. 42). Much of the time the reader
feels treated to an extensive, nuanced, well informed discussion of
assorted diplomatic dead-ends. The negotiations over colonies are
a case in point. In 1936-37 significant elements in the British
diplomatic establishment (but not the foreign secretary, Anthony
Eden) felt that yielding (mostly French) colonies to Germany would
either appease German appetites or, at a minimum, strengthen
assorted "moderates" surrounding the German economics minister
Hjalmar Schacht. An entire chapter is devoted to this issue
despite the fact that Lord Plymouth, who headed a committee on the
feasibility of colonial concessions, reported (correctly) that
Hitler would not be satisfied with British or French colonies.
Moreover, Leon Blum's abortive discussion with Schacht in August
1936 notwithstanding, neither Andre Francois-Poncet, Germanophile
French ambassador to Germany, nor Marius Moutet, Socialist minister
of colonies, nor the entire French general staff were anything but
utterly hostile to the whole enterprise. Similarly, the history of
both French and British re-armament in the late 1930s is well
known. The author promises not to rehash this issue but rather "to
assess rearmament as a feature within Anglo-French relations" (p.
147). Yet we soon learn that "there was remarkably little British
impact upon the direction of French rearmament" during the period
under discussion (p. 154).
It may be that Anglo-French relations improve under
the Popular Front. Certainly the British professed a distinct
preference for dealing with Leon Blum and Yvon Delbos as opposed
to, say, Louis Barthou or, especially, Pierre Laval. But serious
tensions persisted: over Spain, Ethiopia and former German
colonies. As the author notes, the relationship was rather more
tense by the end of 1937 than had been the case six months earlier.
Such improvement as there was would appear to owe less to French
diplomacy than to "Britain's strategic dependence upon France" (p.
231). And, when his story ends, in the spring of 1938, it is not
at all clear that the French had made much progress in weaning the
British off their penchant for appeasement. Nor would anything in
the next six months suggest such a development.
In spite of the title _Britain, France and
Appeasement_, this is a book which says nothing about the Munich
settlement. Georges Bonnet, a name as intimately associated with
appeasement as is that of Neville Chamberlain, appears primarily
in his capacity as minister of finance. The key here is the
subtitle, _Anglo-French Relations in the Popular Front Era_, which
permits the author to end his account with--and really before--
Blum's ephemeral second government (March-April 1938). Just when
the Popular Front ended is a matter of debate: from some
perspectives it was dead with the defeat of Blum's first government
on 22 June 1937 and deader still with the formation of the
Chautemps government, without socialist participation, on 18
January 1938. The logic which insists that the Popular Front was
still alive in March 1938 is the same logic that has it lasting
until 30 November of the same year. But such periodicity would
ruin the author's thesis. On the last page of the book, he assures
readers that "French willingness to fall in with the early stages
of Chamberlain's distinctive appeasement in 1936 and 1937 did not
presage the humiliating French appeasement at Munich in September
1938" (p. 234). No compelling arguments are adduced for this
proposition and most readers are likely to conclude that exactly
the opposite is true.
William D. Irvine
York University
birvine@erda.glendon.yorku.ca
Copyright 1997 by H-Net, all rights reserved. This
work may be copied for non-profit educational use if proper credit
is given to the author and the list. For other permission, please
contact H-Net@h-net.msu.edu.
List of reviews
Guidelines for reviewers
Page created 14 October 1997 - Last updated 14 October 1997
Links checked 14 October 1997 - HTML validated 14 October 1997
Maintained by Barry Russell: barry@sol.brookes.ac.uk
Suggestions/comments welcome
|